This
statement sounds harsh until you
actually stop to think about it.
What do most adults actually use
from their years of schooling?
Reading, writing, and basic math are
essential. No question. You need to
read contracts, write emails,
calculate tips, manage a budget.
Those are non-negotiable. But
everything beyond that? For the vast
majority of people, it's just
trivia.
Think about biology.
Most adults couldn't name the parts
of a cell or explain photosynthesis.
They don't need to. They live
perfectly fine without it. Think
about geometry. When was the last
time you used the Pythagorean
theorem? Unless you're in
construction or engineering,
probably never. Think about history.
Do you remember the dates of major
battles or the terms of obscure
treaties? No, because they don't
matter to your daily life. Think
about literature. Do you still
remember the symbolism in the novels
you were forced to read? Most people
don't, and they're not worse off for
it.
This isn't an argument
against knowledge. It's an argument
against forced knowledge. There's
nothing wrong with learning biology
if you're interested in it. There's
nothing wrong with studying history
if it matters to you. There's
nothing wrong with reading
literature if it enriches your life.
But forcing everyone to learn
everything, regardless of interest
or relevance, is a massive waste of
time and energy.
Consider the
scale of this waste. Thirteen years.
Eleven thousand hours. That's more
time than most people spend on any
single activity in their lives. And
for what? So that adults can forget
almost all of it and still function
perfectly well. The system consumes
the most precious resource young
people have—their time—and delivers
almost nothing of lasting value.
The tragedy is that those
thousands of hours could have been
spent on things that actually
matter. A kid who loves working with
his hands could have spent those
hours becoming a master carpenter. A
kid who loves helping people could
have spent them volunteering and
learning to care for others. A kid
who loves technology could have
spent them coding and building.
Instead, they spent them sitting in
classrooms, memorizing facts for
tests they'd soon forget.
This waste is especially cruel for
low-income kids. They don't have
margin. They don't have safety nets.
Every hour spent on trivia is an
hour not spent on something that
might actually lift them out of
poverty. The system takes their most
valuable asset—time—and squanders it
on things that won't help them
succeed. Then it blames them when
they struggle.
Think about
what "useful activities" actually
means. It means learning skills that
lead to self-sufficiency. It means
developing the kind of deep
knowledge that actually gets used.
It means practicing things that will
matter in real life. It means having
time to explore interests, discover
passions, and build the kind of
expertise that leads to meaningful
work.
The objection to this
is always the same: "But what if
they need that knowledge later?" The
answer is simple: they can learn it
later, when they actually need it.
People do this all the time. Adults
learn new skills constantly—on the
job, through online courses, from
mentors, by reading. The idea that
everything must be learned before
age 18 or it's lost forever is
completely false. Learning is
lifelong. The only thing lost is the
time wasted on things that never
mattered.
This isn't about
dumbing down education. It's about
making it real. It's about admitting
that most of what we force on kids
is forgettable and forgotten. It's
about redirecting those thousands of
hours to things that actually help
people live well. Reading, writing,
and basic math are the foundation.
Everything else should be chosen,
not forced. That's not radical.
That's just honest.
Back