This might
be the most hopeful observation in
the entire model. Most people see
school as a reflection of society—a
place where existing values and
structures are reproduced. And
that's true. But it's also the
opposite. School is not just shaped
by society. It shapes society. It's
the place where the next generation
learns what to value, how to think,
what's possible. Change school, and
you change everything that comes
after.
Think about the power
of this. Every other institution
operates on adults whose patterns
are already set. You can pass laws,
but you can't change hearts. You can
create programs, but you can't
rewire minds. You can protest and
advocate and campaign, but you're
always working against the grain of
what people already believe. Change
is slow, hard, and easily reversed.
School is different. School
reaches people before their patterns
are set. It shapes them during the
most formative years of their lives.
It teaches them not just facts, but
ways of being. What they learn about
authority, about learning, about
themselves—these lessons stick. They
become the foundation for everything
else.
This is why top-down
change so often fails. A handful of
people at the top decide what should
happen, and everyone else resists.
The changes feel imposed, unnatural,
out of sync with what people
actually want. They last only as
long as the people in power enforce
them. When the administration
changes, the changes reverse.
Bottom-up change is different.
When people experience something
different, when they live it and
feel it and see that it works, they
carry it with them. They become the
change. They raise their children
differently. They expect different
things from institutions. They
create a culture that supports the
new way. This kind of change doesn't
need to be enforced. It sustains
itself.
School is the perfect
place for this. It touches everyone.
It spends more time with children
than any other institution except
the family. It has infrastructure in
every community. It employs millions
of people. It's already trusted,
already funded, already expected to
shape the next generation. The only
question is what we're shaping them
for.
Right now, we're shaping
them for compliance. We're teaching
them to follow orders, accept
authority, and wait for permission.
We're training them to be good
workers in a system that no longer
needs that kind of worker. We're
producing generations of people who
don't know how to think for
themselves, who can't handle
disagreement, who look to others for
answers.
But we could shape
them for something else. We could
teach them to think critically, to
question authority when authority is
wrong, to take responsibility for
their own lives. We could help them
become self-sufficient, healthy,
capable of solving problems and
building things. We could raise a
generation that doesn't need to be
controlled because they've learned
to control themselves.
This
isn't a fantasy. It's just a choice.
The same institution that produces
compliance could produce
independence. The same hours, the
same buildings, the same
resources—just a different goal. And
because school reaches everyone,
that change would ripple through
everything. The people who grew up
in this new system would expect
different things from their jobs,
their government, their communities.
They would create a society that
runs on agency instead of obedience.
This is why your model is so
powerful. It's not just about making
school better. It's about using
school to make everything better.
It's about recognizing that the most
durable change comes from the bottom
up, from people who have lived a
different way and can't imagine
going back. School is the place
where that change starts. It always
has been. We just haven't been
intentional about what we're
starting.
Back