These four concepts are not negotiable. They're not preferences or opinions. They're foundational realities about what human beings actually need and want. Any institution that claims to serve people has to start from these truths, not work against them. And yet school, as currently designed, conflicts with every single one.

Free speech is absolutely essential. Not because every idea is equally valid, but because you cannot have genuine learning without the freedom to question, to disagree, to explore ideas that might be wrong or uncomfortable. School does the opposite. It rewards giving the expected answer. It punishes challenging the authority. It treats disagreement as disruption. Students learn quickly that the safe path is to shut up and comply. Then we wonder why social media is full of people who can't handle a difference of opinion. They never practiced.

People want to be healthy. This is not controversial. Everyone wants to feel good, have energy, avoid disease, live longer. And yet school does almost nothing to support this. It keeps kids sitting for hours. It serves food that makes them sick. It cuts recess and gym to make room for more test prep. It creates so much stress that anxiety and depression are now epidemic. The message is clear: your health is less important than your compliance. Then we wonder why adults struggle with obesity, chronic disease, and mental health crises.

People want to be independent. This is the whole point of growing up. Every child wants to be able to do things for themselves, make their own choices, live their own life. And yet school does everything it can to delay independence. It makes all the decisions. It controls every moment. It teaches that responsibility is something that happens later, after you've finished obeying. Students spend 13 years practicing dependence and then we're surprised when they struggle to launch as adults. The muscle never got worked.

We're only as happy as the people around us. Humans are social creatures. Our wellbeing depends on connection, belonging, and healthy relationships. And yet school isolates us by age, pits us against each other for grades and rankings, and treats social time as a distraction from real work. It doesn't teach how to resolve conflict, how to listen, how to support others, how to build community. Then we wonder why loneliness is epidemic and why people don't know how to disagree without destroying each other.

Any school idea that conflicts with any of these four isn't set up to serve the people. It might serve the institution. It might serve the economy. It might serve the state. But it doesn't serve the humans inside it. And the reason most school ideas fail this test is that they contain an authoritarian element. They force people to do things against their will. And force inevitably violates these concepts.

When you force someone to be somewhere they don't want to be, you're violating their autonomy, which undermines independence. When you force them to learn things they don't care about, you're treating their interests as irrelevant, which undermines the curiosity that drives real learning. When you force them to sit still for hours, you're treating their bodies as obstacles, which undermines health. When you force them to comply rather than question, you're treating their minds as empty vessels, which undermines free thought. When you force them into competitive rankings, you're treating other people as threats rather than allies, which undermines connection.

The alternative is a school that is 100% for the participant and 0% for the school. That means every decision starts from the question: does this help the person in front of us? Not does this make our job easier. Not does this fit our schedule. Not does this meet state requirements. But does this help this person become healthier, more independent, more connected, more capable of thinking for themselves?

When that becomes the guiding principle, everything changes. The building becomes a resource instead of a prison. The adults become helpers instead of enforcers. The students become participants instead of captives. And the four concepts stop being ideals we're failing to reach and start being the foundation everything is built on.

This is not complicated. It's just honest. People want to be free, healthy, independent, and connected. Any system that helps them get there will be used and valued. Any system that doesn't will have to be forced. The fact that school requires force is the clearest possible sign that it's failing these four tests. And the only way to pass them is to remove the force entirely.

Back

 

 

Q and A about the Plan

 

The $200,000 Lesson

An interesting metaphor about school and life

 

 

Deepseek critique of my plan

Claude critique of my plan

ChatGPT critique of my plan

Gemini critique of my plan

Grok critque of my plan

 

Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  </ta