One of the most common objections to new ideas is that they're untested, risky, or hypothetical. People want proof before they'll consider change. What's remarkable about this model is that the proof already exists everywhere we look. Nothing I'm proposing hasn't already been proven to work in other contexts. The only innovation is taking what works and applying it to school.

Think about gyms. They're voluntary. People pay to use them. They show up consistently, work hard, and achieve real results. No one forces them. No one threatens consequences if they skip. They come because they value what the gym offers. The same is true for music lessons, sports leagues, art classes, coding bootcamps, language learning apps, and countless other voluntary pursuits. People learn, grow, and improve every single day without anyone forcing them.

Think about libraries. They're free. They're open to everyone. No one checks whether you're using them correctly. You can come for books, computers, programs, or just a quiet place to sit. The staff is there to help, not to judge. And libraries are beloved institutions because they serve rather than control. People don't resent libraries. They fight to protect them.

Think about mentorship. When someone wants to learn a trade, they find an expert and ask for guidance. The expert shares what they know, not because they have to, but because they want to help. This model has produced generations of skilled workers, artists, and entrepreneurs. It doesn't require a curriculum or a test. It just requires someone who knows and someone who wants to learn.

Think about community centers. They offer classes, activities, and gathering spaces for people of all ages. No one forces anyone to attend. No one tracks attendance or issues grades. People come because they find value in what's offered. The same building that hosts a seniors' card game in the morning might host a teen coding club in the afternoon and an adult education class in the evening. The community center serves the community because it's designed to.

Think about after-school activities. This is the most direct proof. Right there, in the same building, with the same kids, doing the same subjects—voluntary participation produces engagement, effort, and results that mandatory classes rarely achieve. The only difference is choice. The kids chose to be there. And because they chose, they own it.

Think about how people learn to do their jobs. Most skills are learned on the job, not in a classroom. New employees watch, ask questions, make mistakes, and get feedback. They learn because they need to know in order to succeed. No one forces them to learn. The job itself creates the motivation.

Think about how people learn to parent. No classes, no curriculum, no tests. They read books, ask friends, watch videos, and figure it out as they go. The stakes are high, so they learn. The motivation comes from love and responsibility, not coercion.

All of these are proven models. They work. People use them, value them, and often pay for them willingly. The only thing I'm doing is asking: why can't school work this way too? Why can't we take the best ideas from gyms, libraries, mentorships, community centers, after-school programs, and on-the-job training and make them the core of how we educate?

This isn't a leap of faith. It's a leap of logic. The proof is already all around us. We just haven't connected the dots. Everything we need to know about how to create a system that people actually want to use is already visible in the world. We just have to stop assuming that school has to be the one exception to every rule that works everywhere else.

Back

 

 

Q and A about the Plan

 

The $200,000 Lesson

An interesting metaphor about school and life

 

 

Deepseek critique of my plan

Claude critique of my plan

ChatGPT critique of my plan

Gemini critique of my plan

Grok critque of my plan

 

Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  </ta