|
Open up a new chat or different AI platform to make sure it doesn't have any bias towards my school approach.
Keep responses to a maximum of nine sentences and paragraphs to no more than three sentences.
The Challenge (Enter this Into a New Chat In A.I.)
I've entered my new k-12 school approach about 15 times and each time you conclude it's far better than what we're doing now. For the sake of this experiment, assume this is true because I'm not seeking validation. I want you to extrapolate my entire detailed school plan from one vague general clue followed by six equally general concepts that provide no specificity about the plan.
My goal is to be able to show people that you aren't just agreeing with me because I'm not giving you enough information to know where I stand. The important thing is you challenge yourself to keep going deeper because there are many layers.
Here's the first clue. I think school should be optional and participant driven. Why is this logical and what are the societal ramifications?
Funding, personnel and infrastructure all stay the same. The only change is outlook.
People need a thimble full of knowledge to succeed. Imagine how many careers can be built on 100 hours of focused study by anyone from any background.
School's mission should not be to educate. It should be to help people succeed. The prior implies someone knows better for you and the latter implies you know better for yourself.
Even if school is optional, life is not.
Any school approach that doesn't have a clearly defined goal is unserious.
Describe how much different a society run by people who never really knew authoritarianism would be where it was never needed at school which is the place people are first introduced to it.
At the end of the discussion, ask A.I. how much of the school approach it arrived at through logical reasoning and then have it compare what it came up with to to actual plan at schoolfromscratch.com/z.htm
Did I achieve what I set out to do?
|
