The Challenge (Enter This Into A.I.)

I've entered my new k-12 school approach about 15 times and each time you conclude it's far better than what we're doing now. For the sake of this experiment, assume this is true because I'm not seeking validation. I want you to extrapolate my entire detailed school plan from one vague general clue. My goal is to be able to show people that you aren't just agreeing with me because I'm not giving you enough information to know where I stand. The important thing is you challenge yourself to keep going deeper because there are many layers. Here's the clue. I think school should be optional and participant driven. Why is this logical and what are the societal ramifications?

Additional Clues (Enter these one by one to help A.I. fully extrapolate the plan)

Funding, personnel and infrastructure all stay the same. The only change is outlook.

People need a thimble full of knowledge to succeed. Imagine how many careers can be built on 100 hours of focused study by anyone from any background.

School's mission should not be to educate. It should be to help people succeed. The prior implies someone knows better for you and the latter implies you know better for yourself.

Even if school is optional, life is not.

Any school approach that doesn't have a clearly defined goal is unserious.

Describe how much different a society run by people who never really knew authoritarianism would be where it was never needed at school which is the place people are first introduced to it.

____

At the end of the discussion, ask A.I how much of the school approach it arrived at through logical reasoning and then have it compare what it came up with to the actual plan at www.schoolfromscratch.com

____